Hi Ben,
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
I replied to you and Jeff personally because there was nothing in the
mail I received indicating that it came from core-talk. Apart from
'Received:' fields the only field that mentions core-talk is
X-Original-To: EPICS core-talk <[email protected]>
Something in the email path between APS and you must have rewritten the
To: field - my original message is archived and shows that I sent the
message To: EPICS core-talk <[email protected]>
http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/core-talk/2006/msg00023.php
I don't think APS is doing the rewriting, but I might be wrong - can
anyone else confirm or deny that?
Disruptions like these could be avoided by automatically setting
'reply-to' field messages sent from tech-talk and core-talk.
There are two sides to that particular argument:
http://www.producingoss.com/html-chunk/mailing-lists.html#reply-to
- Andrew
--
There is no S in exprexxo.
- References:
- Re: 3.15 C++ Exception classes Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: 3.15 C++ Exception classes Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Next:
Re: 3.15 C++ Exception classes Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: 3.15 C++ Exception classes Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Fwd: Re: 3.15 C++ Exception classes Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|