> Note that this is a 68040 cpu, i.e. it is slow
Its not easy to test 68k here.
Nevertheless, these particular spy results are surely server side code
driven and AFAIKT the server hasn't changed in any way that would
impact efficency between R3.14.7 and R3.14.8.
Nevertheless, I have commited a slightly better Mantis 111 fix to
the client side, but again I'm not expecting that this would have much
impact on server side CPU consumption.
> When I run the mrkSoftTest/caApp test on vxWorks I get
>
> 1) neither testcaput or testcaget completes all their connections
> 2) spy shows
>
> CAS-client 8d4d5c 179 90% ( 9014) 88%
> ( 651)
I ran this:
~/epicsR3.14/epics/mrkSoftTest/caApp$ jobs
[3] Running ../bin/linux-x86/testcaput 5000 5 &
[4] Running ../bin/linux-x86/testcaput 5000 5 &
[6] Running ../bin/linux-x86/testcaput 5000 5 &
[7]- Running ../bin/linux-x86/testcaput 5000 5 &
[8]+ Running ../bin/linux-x86/testcaput 5000 5 &
~/epicsR3.14/epics/mrkSoftTest/caApp$
~/epicsR3.14/epics/mrkSoftTest/caApp$
~/epicsR3.14/epics/mrkSoftTest/caApp$ ../bin/linux-x86/testcaget 5000 1
stateChanges 04200 time 2005/11/08 16:41:38.769362
readAccess 04200 writeAccess 04200 time 2005/11/08 16:41:38.769362
notConnected 00800 time 2005/11/08 16:41:38.769362
stateChanges 00800 time 2005/11/08 16:41:39.779527
readAccess 05000 writeAccess 05000 time 2005/11/08 16:41:39.779527
notConnected 00000 time 2005/11/08 16:41:39.779527
And I see this:
iocca> spyReport
NAME ENTRY TID PRI total % (ticks) delta % (ticks)
-------- -------- ----- --- --------------- ---------------
tExcTask excTask 1dfe740 0 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
tLogTask logTask 1dfbdb8 0 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
tShell shell 13dbb98 1 0% ( 32) 0% ( 12)
tNetTask netTask 1bb9990 50 1% ( 269) 1% ( 21)
tPortmapd portmapd 1b88cd8 100 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
syncNTP 1b35080 109 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
cbHigh 1b3a928 128 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
timerQueue 1b4e8e0 129 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scanOnce 154a348 129 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan0.1 15237b0 133 0% ( 1) 0% ( 0)
scan0.2 1528fb8 134 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
cbMedium 1b420c0 135 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan0.5 152e7c0 135 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan1 1533fc8 136 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan2 15397d0 137 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan5 153efd8 138 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
scan10 15447e0 139 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
cbLow 1b49858 140 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
dbCaLink 1661040 149 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
poolPoll 1b7e3c8 149 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-client 14988f8 179 4% ( 1188) 5% ( 106)
CAS-client 12b4fb8 179 1% ( 511) 4% ( 83)
CAS-client 122ee38 179 1% ( 449) 4% ( 76)
CAS-client 11ae4c0 179 1% ( 424) 4% ( 76)
CAS-client 1137b50 179 1% ( 382) 4% ( 74)
CAS-client 10ba2d0 179 0% ( 77) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 149b9f0 180 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 14bf348 180 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 12af7b0 180 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 11b15b8 180 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 113ac48 180 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-event 12344d8 180 2% ( 545) 10% ( 193)
CAS-TCP 151d7f8 181 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-beacon 1b83618 182 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
CAS-UDP 1b814c0 183 0% ( 96) 0% ( 0)
errlog 1b52fe0 189 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
taskwd 1b50d70 189 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0)
cpuUsageTask 1b75c68 255 20% ( 5331) 17% ( 303)
KERNEL 0% ( 51) 0% ( 6)
INTERRUPT 0% ( 70) 0% ( 17)
IDLE 61% ( 16309) 45% ( 800)
TOTAL 92% ( 26550) 94% ( 1767)
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
As mentioned earlier, this has been fixed.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marty Kraimer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:24 AM
> To: [email protected]; Jeff Hill
> Subject: Re: R3.14.8 testing
>
>
> More news.
>
> When I run the mrkSoftTest/caApp test on vxWorks I get
>
> 1) neither testcaput or testcaget completes all their connections
> 2) spy shows
>
> CAS-client 8d4d5c 179 90% ( 9014) 88%
> ( 651)
>
>
> Note that this is a 68040 cpu, i.e. it is slow
>
> This does not happen on either solaris or linux.
>
> Marty Kraimer wrote:
>
> > I did a CVS update and complete rebuild
> >
> > On vxWorks and solaris I get
> >
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
> > ../online_notify.c: CA beacon socket disconnect error was
> > "S_errno_EADDRNOTAVAIL"
> >
> > I do not get this on linux.
> >
>
- References:
- Re: R3.14.8 testing Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: R3.14.8 testing Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Next:
Re: 3.14.8: blockingSockTest - assert() fails. Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: R3.14.8 testing Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: R3.14.8 testing Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·