Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
Hi Andrew and all,
Andrew Johnson wrote:
Does the SLS event system support make use of the er* and eg* record
types from Base, or do they have their own record types? If APS is the
only site actually using these records then we should definately remove
them, but if sites using the SLS event boards rely on the record types
then they probably should remain. Timo, would you like to comment on
Dayle's suggestion?
There are four record types (at the moment) that are related to the
event system (APS & derivatives): eg, egevent, er, erevent.
For the SLS event system the er and eg record have been quite radically
extended; with the Diamond system even more. The e*eventRecords are (or
better said, could be) used unmodified from the base. But I would agree
(and strongly prefer) them to be removed from the base and having them
in a separate package as Dayle suggested. They are closely bound to the
hardware and have no use outside the event system.
That implies however that we have to take care of packaging the things
properly. We probably will need different packages for the different
hardware generations.
best regards,
Timo
- Andrew
Marty Kraimer wrote:
Andrew Johnson wrote:
I agree with Dayle that we should remove these records from base,
especially as they're already unbundled into modules/timing/apsEvent,
but I'm not 100% convinced we should do it in the middle of a major
release number - any comments either way from the floor?
- Andrew
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out
of base
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dayle Kotturi <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Johnson <[email protected]>
Hi Andrew,
Can I put in a vote to pull er*Record and eg*Record support from
base/src/rec
in the next release? It's hardware support and doesn't belong with soft
ioc records. It's better in the site packages evg and evr.
Dayle
The device and driver support has already been removed from base for
the next 3.14 release.
This means that applications that use the APS event system already
have to make some changes.
This let them also get egRecord, egeventRecord, erRecord, and
ereventRecord from modules/timing/apsEvent.
As I recall at least some of these were modified for the SLS and later
event systems.
Marty
--
Timo Korhonen PSI (Paul Scherrer Institut)
CH-5232 Villigen PSI
tel + 41- 56 3103262 fax + 41 - 56 310 3383
e-mail: [email protected]
- References:
- [Fwd: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out of base] Andrew Johnson
- Re: [Fwd: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out of base] Marty Kraimer
- Re: [Fwd: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out of base] Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: [Fwd: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out of base] Dayle Kotturi
- Next:
Re: Data Access Name Clash Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: [Fwd: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out of base] Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Data Access / status of CVS repository Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 02 Feb 2012 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|