Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
Jeff Hill wrote:
The device support interface is defined by the record type and not by the
device support module. So, in principal, if the record type decides to add a
new routine then this will work just fine with devices which follow the
rules and specify the proper number of entries for previous revisions of the
interface.
The devGpib for 3.13, Bemjamins version, gpibCore, and devGpib for asyn ALL
define a struct gDset that has the first members the same as that used by
stansard record types. If a standard record type they will have to be changed. I
suspect that other device support may have done the same thing.
Marty
- References:
- RE: Why we can't extend the DSET or DRVET Jeff Hill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Why we can't extend the DSET or DRVET Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Why we can't extend the DSET or DRVET Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 02 Feb 2012 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|