Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

> Didn't this also arise in 3.13 for the host support for Digital
> Unix?

Both R3.13 and R3.12 CA client libraries ran on the alpha, and possibly
also R3.11. I think that Mark Anderson was the original person that was
asking for this.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marty Kraimer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: Andrew Johnson
> Cc: Jeff Hill - LANL; Janet Anderson; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double
> 
> I have a feeling that this is only the beginning of problems
> related to
> supporting 64 bit architectures.
> 
> Isn't there a compiler switch that says to generate 32 bit mode?
> 
> Didn't this also arise in 3.13 for the host support for Digital
> Unix?
> 
> Marty
> 
> Andrew Johnson wrote:
> > I received this bug report this morning from a Digital Unix
> user testing
> > R3.14.0beta2.  I've replied to him about the bug tracker
> stuff, but I'll
> > leave the RISC_pad issue to Jeff and/or Marty to fix.  I'm
> not convinced
> > that we should be using dbr_long_t but it might be right.

References:

Re: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double Marty Kraimer

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double Andrew Johnson

Next: RE: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double Jeff Hill

Index: <2002>  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double Marty Kraimer

Next: RE: RISC_pad in dbr_time_double Jeff Hill

Index: <2002>  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024