On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 10:48 AM, Marty Kraimer wrote:
I will add the following to epicsThread.h
static const unsigned epicsThreadPriorityIocsh = 91;
static const unsigned epicsThreadPriorityBaseMax = 91;
Any objections?
Maybe :-)
Eric Norum wrote:
and I think Till would agree, that the IOC shell should also run at a
priority less than the scan tasks to ensure the determinism of the
scan tasks.
I don't like the idea of a (l)user disrupting time-critical scan tasks
by typing some long-running command.
I'd rather have IOC shell run just below the scan task priority.
Booting tornado II gives
ExcTask _excTask fe80f4 0 PEND 6cd04 fe8054
0 0
tLogTask _logTask fe57cc 0 PEND 6cd04 fe5728
0 0
tShell _shell ed9540 1 READY 2cfc4 ed91e8
1c0001 0
tTelnetd _telnetd edfb38 2 PEND 253ea edfa48
0 0
tNetTask _netTask f57408 50 PEND 253ea f573b0
0 0
tPortmapd _portmapd ede5f8 100 PEND 253ea ede4b0
16 0
Thus to ensure really good real time performance the priority of all
of the above should be changed.
Indeed.
--
Eric Norum <[email protected]>
Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Canada.
Phone: (306) 966-5394 FAX: (306) 966-5407
- References:
- Re: base max thread priority Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: base max thread priority Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Andrew Johnson
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: base max thread priority Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Andrew Johnson
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|