Eric Norum wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 03:17 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
Again: IMO, EPICS should have the _full_ range of OS priorities
available.
Part of the job of porting EPICS to a particular OS would be assigning
the actual values of basic EPICS priorities (like
epicsThreadPriorityIocsh, epicsThreadPriorityBaseMin,
epicsThreadPriorityBaseMax...).
It's absurd: I use EPICS on a real-time OS but have no access to the
priorities needed to get real-time performance when I use the
epicsThread API ;-)
I have mixed feelings. Again in the past when we created tasks with higher
priority than netTask we got failures.
I do see that it is impossible on vxWorks to create a thread with a priority <
100. Thus it is not possible to create a thread with priority > tNetTask.
What to do????
If user really wants a thread with higher priority than tNetTask he/she could do
what Eric suggests and change the priority of tNetTask.
Is 100 levels not enough? If priorities 91-99 were reserved for
application threads only would it not be possible to do what you need?
I think that it's better to coerce other system tasks into the EPICS
range if appropriate since it makes moving a given EPICS application
from one processor to another so much easier.
Sounds good to me.
I think that the 'base max' (I'm still hoping that someone can come up
with a good name for this) priority level (90, right???) should be added
to epicsThread.h.
Could we just define
static const unsigned epicsThreadPriorityIocsh = 91;
And then state that nothing in base has a priority higher than
epicsThreadPriorityIocsh?
If this is not OK I can't think of a better name than
epicsThreadPriorityBaseMax
I dont see any reason to define epicsThreadPriorityNetworkDaemons. The only
operating system that will currently use it is RTEMS.
Marty
- Replies:
- Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- References:
- Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
[no subject] Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|