At the EPICS meeting last week Till asked:
1) Could we declare a maximum priority for any component of base?
2) Why does iocsh run at epicsThreadPriorityMax?
Brief discussion.
1) sounds like a good request. How about
epicsThreadPriorityBaseMax = 91
2) I will assume that this was done to be like vxWorks, which runs the vxWorks
shell at highest priority. If iocsh runs at epicsThreadPriorityBaseMax it seems
like it should be OK. If a very high prority application thread uses all the CPU
time iocsh can't get control but this is the applications problem.
Comments anyone?
Marty
- Replies:
- Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS Bug Tracker Bob Dalesio
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: FW: [EPICS Base R3.14.x 0000018]: gcc 2.95.x crashes on cac.cpp Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: base max thread priority Eric Norum
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|